Sophist
Guest
Ah - it was self-deprecating humour rather than self-awareness. Ok.
Anyway, if I follow your logic, you are saying that it is OK for you not to update the wiki because there are also hundreds of others who do not update the wiki. Well, if we all took that attitude in all things then I guess nothing would ever get done by anybody.
Hugh did not refer to these "hundreds of others" and so he could not have been calling them "lazy and selfish" - indeed his comment about "lazy and selfish" said that he could "respect this". Indeed if anyone is inferring that the "hundreds of others" are "lazy and selfish" it would appear to be you.
What Hugh did comment on was you boasting and taking pride in such an attitude and then bitching about something rather than just fixing it.
However, in a spirit of reconciliation, I would comment that I have been very aware that you have been quite active in helping other users out in the Community forum, and I for one welcome this and would like to recognise it publicly.
S
Anyway, if I follow your logic, you are saying that it is OK for you not to update the wiki because there are also hundreds of others who do not update the wiki. Well, if we all took that attitude in all things then I guess nothing would ever get done by anybody.
Hugh did not refer to these "hundreds of others" and so he could not have been calling them "lazy and selfish" - indeed his comment about "lazy and selfish" said that he could "respect this". Indeed if anyone is inferring that the "hundreds of others" are "lazy and selfish" it would appear to be you.
What Hugh did comment on was you boasting and taking pride in such an attitude and then bitching about something rather than just fixing it.
However, in a spirit of reconciliation, I would comment that I have been very aware that you have been quite active in helping other users out in the Community forum, and I for one welcome this and would like to recognise it publicly.
S