marozen
Member
If you safe a form the data will be safed in the list that belongs to that from.
Is it possible to automatically safe some entries also in another list?
What I try to do now is to design a workflow and each step is entered in a fabrik form. And I want to make it impossible to select a records from other users, but still be able to connect the records from those 2 different steps. I do that by returning entries together (concatenation) (batch). And than compare if that value is equal as the value from the other step. If yes then there is the connection between those workflow steps. This works; however, in some workflows there are steps skipped, so then how the program knows from which step to look for a match? I try to do that by saving all batches from all steps in a separate table with the record-id, and also the step-id. Then this new table of all batches can check the step-id from each matched batch, so then the system knows from which table to select and also the record-id will be given in that new table.
So if it's possible to safe the id, batch, and step-id automatically in a second table automatically I guess it will work.
Is it possible to automatically safe some entries also in another list?
What I try to do now is to design a workflow and each step is entered in a fabrik form. And I want to make it impossible to select a records from other users, but still be able to connect the records from those 2 different steps. I do that by returning entries together (concatenation) (batch). And than compare if that value is equal as the value from the other step. If yes then there is the connection between those workflow steps. This works; however, in some workflows there are steps skipped, so then how the program knows from which step to look for a match? I try to do that by saving all batches from all steps in a separate table with the record-id, and also the step-id. Then this new table of all batches can check the step-id from each matched batch, so then the system knows from which table to select and also the record-id will be given in that new table.
So if it's possible to safe the id, batch, and step-id automatically in a second table automatically I guess it will work.